The point, though, is that I am most comfortable in a crowd. Stopping at 2 kids has never been, for me, a serious consideration. I don't want to have 10, mind you, or even half that number. But the 3-4 range? Sure, I'm on board - so long as there is access to plenty of therapy, because my kids deserve a mom who is on the "fun" side of crazy. Without the proper tools to keep myself in check, I would run a very real risk of turning into more of the "No wire hangers! EVER!" flavor of crazy mother, and nobody wants that -- least of all me.
It's the spacing, the readiness for the next one, that is the burning question of the era. I'm not ready to open that can quite yet -- there are still too many issues to work out health-wise, and a few other life twists to get settled before we will be ready to see what our combined genes can create on the next try.
I have to say, though... with the first two results like this? Some days... it's hard to stay reasonable and rational about it all....
It is on those days that I remember to check the supply levels of the Anti-Pregnancy-Arsenal.
So we are currently stocked through about 2010. And as a bonus? In case some sort of post-apocalyptic nightmare should ensue? No chance I'll have to fend off the invading Zombie armies with a bun in this here oven. Talk about a win-win.
1 comment:
1 of 10??!? That's amazing. My dad is one of 10 - I can't imagine. Family reunions are very hectic.
As I've mentioned before, Shane and David are difficult enough in the late afternoon - I can't imagine them at 5 in the morning.
Post a Comment